Bob Hinden wrote:
>There is a clear tradeoff between a longer ID (to allow for better random
>numbers or MAC addresses) and the size of the subnet field.
>
>Before revising the draft, I would prefer to hear from more people on these
>tradeoffs.
Although I was one of those that suggested a techni
Bob Hinden wrote:
Brian,
At 04:22 AM 5/27/2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Now, as a pragmatist, I would probably settle for a pseudo-random
and probably-unique /48, but not everybody will. I can just imagine a
phone call in which I recommend to IBM's chief network architect to use
address space th
Brian,
At 04:22 AM 5/27/2003, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Now, as a pragmatist, I would probably settle for a pseudo-random
and probably-unique /48, but not everybody will. I can just imagine a
phone call in which I recommend to IBM's chief network architect to use
address space that *probably* nobod
