Re: Draft on Globally Unique IPv6 Local Unicast Addresses

2003-05-29 Thread George Michaelson
On Wed, 28 May 2003 19:03:14 +0700 Robert Elz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date:Tue, 27 May 2003 21:56:02 +1000 From:George Michaelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | But like I said, the current experience shows that excluding routability |

RE: Draft on Globally Unique IPv6 Local Unicast Addresses

2003-05-29 Thread Tony Hain
George Michaelson wrote: ... What is special about a number allocated by the blessed agency in the case we're discussing? Strong admission checks into routing are going to make Joe's numbers less useful. Admission checks by which authority? Remember we are talking about prefixes

Re: Draft on Globally Unique IPv6 Local Unicast Addresses

2003-05-29 Thread George Michaelson
On Wed, 28 May 2003 09:29:59 -0700 Tony Hain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: George Michaelson wrote: ... What is special about a number allocated by the blessed agency in the case we're discussing? Strong admission checks into routing are going to make Joe's numbers less useful.