Date:Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:13:55 +0900
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| i disagree with the standpoint. if we don't standardize what
| is accepted by inet_pton(), we will have usability/portability problem.
We need to standardise wha
Dear community,
I am reading RFC 2464, and I have encountered chapter 6, titled "Address Mapping --
Unicast".
I have to admit I still didn't read the related RFC 2461 (Neighbor Discovery), but I
was wondering if someone would be
willing to provide a short explanation of what is the purpose of th
Mike,
Thanks for the comments. I have a few follow-ups in-line...
1.) The rationale for adding inetCidrRouteDiscards (and deprecating
ipRoutingDiscards in 2011-update) is not documented. While I don't
entirely agree with that decision, I can accept it based on the
following explanation from
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Version 6 Working Group Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Management Information Base for the Transmission
Control Protocol (TCP)
Brian,
I appreciate the comments and am in agreement with everything
you had to say. I don't think there will be time to spin a new
version ahead of the Vienna cutoff date, but will address the
comments (along with Elliot Lear's suggestion on staying
within the requirements space) soon thereafter.
