On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 10:57:11AM +1000, Robert Elz wrote:
> The real killer to IPv4 renumbering is all the other people that you don't
> know who have your IPv4 address recorded somewhere for one reason or
> another. That is what IPv6 really needs to avoid. And that includes
> making all thin
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:56:14PM -0800, Bill Manning wrote:
> %
> % On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:59:54PM -0600, Matt Crawford wrote:
> % > You know what I'm going to liker about the shining all-v6 future?
> % > It's going to be rather difficult for the script kiddies to scan my
> % > entire addre
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:15:32AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Should we program for AF independence (using getaddrinfo/getnameinfo)
> or for IPv6 (and relying in IPv4 mapped addresses for compatibility)
I would say independence, you don't want the applications to work only
with IPv6-enable
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 01:07:35PM -0500, Matt Crawford wrote:
> Please remove the suggestion that DNS servers 'fabricate
> "dummy" answers'! The alternative, that nodes register
> random names, is fine.
How about registering a PTR record for the prefix, if some server can't
find a PTR record fo
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 01:17:56AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Platform: Windows
> >Version: 2000
> >Comment: Output is identical to Itojun's netbsd output, except in
> > two cases where multiple error codes apply and Windows
> > chooses to generate a different one.
> >
>
This is about what I expected, what I didn't like though was:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 11:31:11AM +0900, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI wrote:
> Platform: Linux
> Version: 2.2.16
> Comment: Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 (aka potato), tested on cerberus.
> Tester: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> starting test
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 08:55:51AM +0900, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:28:48
>-0500), "La Monte Henry Piggy Yarroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > >> the v6 application could do this more simply by binding to the v4
> > >> address (be it wil
