Citerat från Tim Chown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This does not work because Joe Six-Pack does not know how to remove
> the
> > default route, so the printer will indeed acquire a default gateway
> by
> > DHCP or RA. Not good enough.
>
> Some vendors have thought a bit about Joe Sixpack and securit
Citerat från Michel Py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Please describe for me what consumer networks (a home connection
> > to an ADSL provider for example) that have dynamic routing with
> > their service providers?
>
> Mine, for example. I have a residential SBC aDSL line,
Citerat från Michel Py <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Among who? You continue to talk about consumers and how
> > things would be easier for them with site-locals. No
> > consumers are using route filtering today. No consumers
> > will need to use route filtering.
>
> On wh
ppropriate tools to let the user
verify that the filers work as expected and let it be up to the user to
decide if he want to use the vendor with or the vendor without such tools
and leave the flexibility in the design?
"Do you want subnet vault.acme.com announced to al
Citerat från Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A) Deprecate Site-Local addresses independently from having an
> alternative
> solution available.
A. Stabilize the patient, then worry about how to make arms and legs work again.
---
Citerat från Tony Hain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No, I am using a well established construct of limiting access by
> restricting where prefixes get routed, and limiting access by filtering
> on
> header bit patterns. That is not overloading on the IP address any more
> than
> current practice does.
Citerat från Tony Hain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So the fact that someone uses filtering does not necessarily
> > imply that they have a need for addresses that inherently
> > have limited range.
> Technically they could (A) go to a border router and block the
> light-switch
> port, then figure
Citerat från Tony Hain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You're asking the DNS views to be in sync with the routing
> > views.
> Yes, a layer violation which is in wide deployment and use today. Yes
> there
> are technical issues which could be dealt with to make it work better,
> but
> those won't happ
YES -- Deprecate site-local unicast addressing
/Fredrik
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub
"YES -- Deprecate site-local unicast addressing".
--
Fredrik Nyman
PacketFront Sweden AB
http://www.packetfront.com/
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.su
10 matches
Mail list logo
