On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 12:48:27PM +0200, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
Is that necessary? IPv4 addresses can be returned in IPv4 Mapped format
if necessary. Just add some text explaining this. With our hybrid
IPv4/IPv6 stack implementation this would work out of the box.
Did I miss some announcement
Title: RE: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-02.txt
Isn't it possible for the DHCPv6 server to return IPv4 addresses as per
RFC 2373, section 2.5.4 (IPv6 Addresses with Embedded IPv4 Addresses),
in particular:
A second type of IPv6 address which holds
Summary of discussion during WG last call on
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-02.txt
Pekka Savola, Tony Lindstrom, Bernie Volz and Peter Koch all responded with
editorial suggestions. These suggestions have been incorporated into the
draft and will appear in next published rev.
Peter Koch
On 22 Feb 2003, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 08:25, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Alain Durand wrote:
On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:
If it's unclear, then we should edit the document to explicitly
identify the addresses as
regarding the use of mapped addresses:
draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-00.txt
might be a useful ID to review before committing this draft to the
stds process.
--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity
In your previous mail you wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 14:54, Bill Manning wrote:
regarding the use of mapped addresses:
draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-00.txt
might be a useful ID to review before committing this draft to the
stds process.
These issues
I'm not sure why you would have a deployed DHCPv6 server and not deploy
a DNS resolver that listens to requests on an IPv6 socket. Can
anybody give a rationale for this? Has anybody done this? Was it a
problem?
In principle, there is nothing that would prevent you from configuring
your
Regarding unpredictable, difficult to debug behavior (see end of quoted
text)...
Shouldn't the host receive the same answer to a DNS query, regardless of
the resolver to which the query is sent? If so, the order in which
resolvers are used by the host shouldn't matter.
What is done today in
Date:Fri, 21 Feb 2003 07:56:20 -0500
From:Ralph Droms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Shouldn't the host receive the same answer to a DNS query, regardless of
| the resolver to which the query is sent? If so, the order in which
| resolvers
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Alain Durand wrote:
On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 10:25 PM, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Alain Durand wrote:
On Thursday, February 20, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:
If it's unclear, then we should edit the document to explicitly
identify
Alain,
If it's unclear, then we should edit the document to explicitly identify
the addresses as IPv6 addresses.
This option is intended to return IPv6 configuration information. IPv4
addresses for DNS resolvers should be provided through DHCPv4...
- Ralph
At 11:40 AM 2/20/2003 -0800, Alain
Date:Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:23:07 -0500
From:Ralph Droms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| And - for other members of the dhc, dnsext and ipv6 WGS: please
| respond to this last call notice with comments or an explicit
| ack to indicate you accept
Pekka,
Thanks for the review and feedback; my comments are in line...
And - for other members of the dhc, dnsext and ipv6 WGS: please
respond to this last call notice with comments or an explicit
ack to indicate you accept the draft as published. Thanks...
- Ralph
At 11:00 AM 2/6/2003 +0200,
Title: RE: [dhcwg] Re: WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsconfig-02.txt
Ralph:
All of the previous comments should be incorporated. But, in addition:
Section 4 and 5 state that a Server sends ... option to the DHCP client.
However, the list of messages in which these options may
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:23:07 -0500,
Ralph Droms [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
And - for other members of the dhc, dnsext and ipv6 WGS: please
respond to this last call notice with comments or an explicit
ack to indicate you accept the draft as published. Thanks...
I'm okay to publish the draft.
15 matches
Mail list logo
