Cellular host draft - where we are and suggestions for moving forward.

2002-03-07 Thread Hesham Soliman (ERA)
Hi all, I think we're having a pretty useful discussion about this draft which has highlighted a number of issues that need to be addressed. This is an attempt to summarise the issues that were discussed and see if we can find a way forward. Please note, this is not to suggest 1, 2 or 3 draf

RE: Cellular host draft - where we are and suggestions for moving forward.

2002-03-07 Thread Tony Hain
required for devices that are directly attached. Tony > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hesham > Soliman (ERA) > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Cellular host draft - whe

RE: Cellular host draft - where we are and suggestions for moving forward.

2002-03-07 Thread Karim El-Malki (ERA)
pread host deployment. /Karim > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: den 7 mars 2002 20:10 > To: Hesham Soliman (ERA); [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Cellular host draft - where we are and suggestions for > moving forward. > > > He

RE: Cellular host draft - where we are and suggestions for moving forward.

2002-03-07 Thread Hesham Soliman (ERA)
> Tony > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hesham > > Soliman (ERA) > > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:58 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >

RE: Cellular host draft - where we are and suggestions for moving forward.

2002-03-07 Thread Tony Hain
ght. Tony > > /Karim > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tony Hain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: den 7 mars 2002 20:10 > > To: Hesham Soliman (ERA); [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: Cellular host draft - where we are and suggesti

RE: Cellular host draft - where we are and suggestions for moving forward.

2002-03-07 Thread Karim El-Malki (ERA)
> > If we delay things further we're just going to end up with 3gpp > > people going off and doing their own thing as Jim pointed out. > > Threatening to go away and do the wrong thing as a > justification to do > the wrong thing here is a waste of time. So far I haven't seen your proof t

RE: Cellular host draft - where we are and suggestions for moving forward.

2002-03-07 Thread Hesham Soliman (ERA)
> thought time-to-market was more important than doing it right. > > Tony > > > > > > /Karim > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tony Hain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: den 7 mars 2002 20:1

RE: Cellular host draft - where we are and suggestions for moving forward.

2002-03-08 Thread john . loughney
Hi Hesham & Tony, > So to re-iterate, the draft _already_ includes > the information required for IPv6 over foo, > but it also adds the minimal requirements. > > Splitting it into 10 documents is not what I'm > concerned about. I want to make sure that > each one of those 10 includes the right