----- Original Message -----
From: JIM FLEMING <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Judith Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: "Causing a collision anywhere on the Internet is ethically
wrong," Gallegos says


> IPv8 and IPv16 "addressing" are supported in Windows 2000.
>
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
>
> IPv6 - [ ICANN Assigned Prefix ] [ User's Address (Ethernet, Phone#) ]
>
> IPv8 - [ 2002:<IPv4 Address> ] [ IPv8 Address (64 bits) ]
>
> IPv16 - [ 2002:<IPv4 Address> ] [ IPv16 Address (64 bits) ]
>
>
> Jim Fleming
> http://www.unir.com
> Mars 128n 128e
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Judith Oppenheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 'JIM FLEMING' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:27 AM
> Subject: RE: "Causing a collision anywhere on the Internet is ethically
> wrong," Gallegos says
>
>
> > Jim, your question can only be considered, from a technical standpoint,
> > *if* the IPv8 standard is adopted.
> >
> > But in IPv4, where we are now, it simply doesn't apply, and IMHO I don't
> > think its fair to castigate TLD operators with whom your business could
> > potentially compete, based on a technical "if."  Its a misrepresentation
> of
> > the facts, and that's not fair to Domain-Policy readers, or the TLD
> > operators you attack.  I don't think it does anything to further your
> > cause, either.
> >
> > Have you any indication, if and when IPv8 might be adopted?
> >
> > Judith
> >
> > P.S.  (a) Thanks for the plug and (b) I hope you don't flame me.  We've
> > spoken at length; I like you, and your genius is confirmed by many
people
> I
> > respect.  But looking at the standard, I can't find anything about if
and
> > when IPv8 might be adopted.  Hence my comment and my question.
> >
> > Judith Oppenheimer, 212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
> > Publisher, http://www.ICBTollFreeNews.com
> > President, http://www.1800TheExpert.com
> > FREE 800/Domain Classifieds, http://ICBclassifieds.com
> > Domain Name & 800 News, Intelligence, Analysis
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Owner-Domain-Policy
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JIM FLEMING
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 9:15 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: "Causing a collision anywhere on the Internet is ethically
> > > wrong," Gallegos says
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.icbtollfreenews.com/
> > >
> > > "Causing a collision anywhere on the Internet is ethically
> > > wrong," Gallegos
> > > says"
> > >
> > > @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
> > >
> > > Does this mean that people will not be allowed to "collide"
> > > with the 37,000+
> > > ONLINE name owners when entered into the ONLINE TLD servers ?
> > >
> > > Is that the "policy" of www.ONLINE-REGISTRY.com ?
> > >
> > > ...or, does ONLINE-REGISTRY.com encourage people to collide with the
> > > existing ONLINE name owners ?
> > >
> > > > 37187 ONLINE
> > > > 15755 INC
> > > > 14787 NET
> > > > 11783 USA
> > > > 9455 E
> > > > 9432 UK
> > > > 8657 WEB
> > > > 8406 GROUP
> > > > 7498 IT
> > > > 7175 DESIGN
> > > > 6935 SHOP
> > > > 6268 TECH
> > > > 6260 WORLD
> > > > 6017 SOLUTIONS
> > > > 5726 US
> > > > 5617 SERVICES
> > > > 5607 LINE
> > > > 5331 TV
> > > > 5212 CONSULTING
> > > > 5188 1
> > > > 5003 INTERNATIONAL
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim Fleming
> > > http://www.unir.com
> > > Mars 128n 128e
> > > http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
> > > http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
> > > http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
> > > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
> > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
> > >
> >
> >
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to