> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:59:51 +0900,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> PS: KAME folks, any clarifications/corrections are requested.
The description basically looks correct. A minor point:
I'm not sure if we provide the client side of "noop (Qtype=0)" and
"supported query types (Qtype=1)."
>Do you implement queries with a name as subject using the multicast
>hash?
>If yes, did you find this useful?
KAME implements stuff with multicast address with hash(hostname) at the
tail, but i don't think many people are using it (= we don't find it
useful).
itojun
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Wed, 16 Jul 2003 05:06:28 -0700), Alain Durand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> > We, USAGI, have two implementations. One is in-kernel,
> > and other is user-space daemon.
> > We have tried supporting all qtypes and all flags.
> > (However, anycast and configurable
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 04:34 AM, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED](B wrote: In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:21:44 -0700), Alain Durand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: I would be curious to get feedback from implementors of
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:21:44 -0700), Alain Durand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> I would be curious to get feedback from implementors of
> draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-10.txt
> on what they have implemented and what they find useful.
We, USAGI, have two imple
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 01:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we think multicast portion is the most important of all usage, i.e.
to learn link-local address of peer on a p2p link. this is the most
important usage in our debugging situations.
(i.e. discover neigh
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>I would be curious to get feedback from implementors of
> >>draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-10.txt
> >>on what they have implemented and what they find useful.
>
> as i said during meeting, i share pekka's opinion that
> combination
>>I would be curious to get feedback from implementors of
>>draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-10.txt
>>on what they have implemented and what they find useful.
as i said during meeting, i share pekka's opinion that
combination of Qtype and ICMP code is unneededly complex,
>I would be curious to get feedback from implementors of
>draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-10.txt
>on what they have implemented and what they find useful.
>
>For example, we only implement the unicast mode and not the multicast
>mode when the subject of a query is an address and we do not
>imp
I would be curious to get feedback from implementors of
draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-10.txt
on what they have implemented and what they find useful.
For example, we only implement the unicast mode and not the multicast
mode when the
subject of a query is an address and we do not implement
10 matches
Mail list logo
