Very good comments; on one point..
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> "d) Having an "announcement" protocol that the DNS resolver could
> use to advertize the host route to the nearby router. Details of
> such a protocols are out of scope of this document, but something
> similar to
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> >Options a) - c) should be sufficient to describe how the routing system
> >will get the information.
>
> The three points you mention all indicate that you would "run a
> routing protocol" to inject routes into the routing system.
Yep. Routing
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Bob Hinden wrote:
I must chime in to say I dislike this approach a bit, but it could be
salvageable. (Though, I must admit I like an option in RA's more..)
Most of all, I dislike using *3* well known site local addresses. One
should suffice just fine. Remember that this m
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Rob Austein wrote:
> At Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:36:37 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Savola wrote:
> >
> > Using DNS, we could specify very simple mechanisms for service discovery
> > (note: those services, unlike to DNS, are not really required for all
> > notes. Stuff like NTP should be o
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Derek Fawcus wrote:
> I think this draft is a poor idea, and that if people want an
> autoconfig mechanism, then something along the lines of
> draft-beloeil-ipv6-dns-resolver-option-00.txt would be nore sensible.
>
> Mind one would still have to configure the router to gene
