> The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'IPv6 Global Unicast
> Address Format' as an
> Informational RFC. This document will replace RFC2374 and
> reclassify RFC 2374 (and the TLA/NLA structure described there)
> as historic.
This announcement was premature; there are still ongoing d
At 12:46 PM 6/19/2003 -0400, Thomas Narten wrote:
Is this OK with everyone?
If so, we either need to reissue the document or ask for an RFC editor
note. I can go either way.
If it is okay with everyone, let's just re-issue the document.
I think that would be cleaner.
Margaret
--
Margaret,
I just submitted it.
Bob
At 09:52 AM 6/19/2003, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
At 12:46 PM 6/19/2003 -0400, Thomas Narten wrote:
Is this OK with everyone?
If so, we either need to reissue the document or ask for an RFC editor
note. I can go either way.
If it is okay with everyone, let's ju
Thomas,
> The global routing prefix is designed to be hierarchically
> structured by the RIRs and ISPs, and the subnet field is
> designed to be hierarchically structured by site administrators.
> Is this OK with everyone?
I'm OK with it, but I'll make a quick comment:
One (it not the) reason w
