Agreed!
- kurtis -
On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 07:30 PM, Alain Durand wrote:
Tony,
I do not think it will work. Way too many efforts failed in the v6 wg
and it is time to focus, not create again a mega wg.
I have an alternate suggestion:
- recharter the ipv6 wg to focus on advancing the
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I share Tony's frustration with long hiatus in multi6, but it
seems to be unstuck at the moment. I also agree that it's
hard to separate the topics, but I see no practical advantage
in repatriating the multihoming issue into this WG, which
already has a diverse
Tony Hain wrote:
This whole discussion is about multihoming, which points out the failure of
the approach to move the multihoming discussion into a separate WG. Multi6
should be closed NOW, and that work should be folded back into the IPv6 WG
so there can be a comprehensive approach to the issues
I share Tony's frustration with long hiatus in multi6, but it seems
to be unstuck at the moment. I also agree that it's hard to separate
the topics, but I see no practical advantage in repatriating the
multihoming issue into this WG, which already has a diverse agenda.
Brian
Alain Durand
