Quoting Francis Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
>There is presently now trouble with wlan cards and multicast from
> Lucent and
> ^^^
>
> => I believe you mean "no" ?
>
Yes, thanks for the correction.
Martin
---
In your previous mail you wrote:
There is presently now trouble with wlan cards and multicast from Lucent and
^^^
=> I believe you mean "no" ?
Cisco. These are the cards I use.
> I have seen wlan systems having trouble with multicast and ipv6 nodes
> unabl
Hi Werner,
>
> what about firewalls ? when tunneling ipv6 packets in an encapsulated
> ipv4 there should not be a problem, right ?
Depends on the type/locationof the firewall.
Not much specific firewall and IDS work is available that I've found, and I've looked
hard. Any list pointers to info
There is presently now trouble with wlan cards and multicast from Lucent and
Cisco. These are the cards I use.
Quoting Jung Cyndi-ACJ099 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have seen wlan systems having trouble with multicast and ipv6 nodes
> unable to receive RAs, resulting in no global prefix at the ipv
I have seen wlan systems having trouble with multicast and ipv6 nodes
unable to receive RAs, resulting in no global prefix at the ipv6 node.
But that was a couple of years ago, and the wlan APs are getting much
better (and cheaper). However, that is a difference between IPv4 and IPv6
that might b
In your previous mail you wrote:
some newbie questions:
has anybody an idea if ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling works with normal access
=> this works well
points and in this context mobile ipv6 ? when packets are encapsulated
in ipv4 it should theoretically.
=> in the conte
some newbie questions:
has anybody an idea if ipv6 over ipv4 tunneling works with normal access
points and in this context mobile ipv6 ? when packets are encapsulated
in ipv4 it should theoretically.
what about firewalls ? when tunneling ipv6 packets in an encapsulated
ipv4 there should not
