I have a different question in the same context. Assume two nodes
node A and node B on the same link. If node A (malicious) does
not do *DAD* and sends out a packet with node B's address as source
address to B, B should drop the packet. But this is not mentioned
in the spec anywhere. It
In your previous mail you wrote:
The question has to do with NA NS where the destination address (== the
target address) is tentative.
= I have an incredibly simple answer: our code doesn't receive packets
to a tentative address!
Ideally one should not recieve packets
I have a different question in the same context. Assume two nodes
node A and node B on the same link. If node A (malicious) does
not do *DAD* and sends out a packet with node B's address as source
address to B, B should drop the packet. But this is not mentioned
in the spec anywhere. It
rich,
might want to check with UNH too to see if they have interpreted it
differently.
/jim
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:
In your previous mail you wrote:
The question has to do with NA NS where the destination address (== the
target address) is tentative.
= I have an incredibly simple answer: our code doesn't receive packets
to a tentative address!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS: I've put "our" because this
I'm reviewing the latest TAHI test results. They've added some new tests for
autoconfiguration, and one of them raises a question.
If I receive a Neighbor Advertisement and the Destination Address in the
IPv6 header is a tentative address and the Target Address in the NA is the
same tentative
The question has to do with NA NS where the destination
address (== the
target address) is tentative.
Seems like that shouldn't be happening normally. So the TAHI
interpretation seems reasonable. Either way, the cited wording in 2462
could be better.
Yes. I'm happy to go with the
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 2:36 PM
To: Thomas Narten (E-mail); IPng List (E-mail)
Subject: quick autoconf question
I'm reviewing the latest TAHI test results. They've added
some new tests for
autoconfiguration, and one of them raises a question.
If I receive a Neighbor
