Indeed, the matter is strongly related with theoretical proof of evolution
of human intelligence.
Discussion of "evolution of human intelligence" is indeed a disucussion
about
THE NEXT OF COPENHAGEN INTERPRETATION.
// We should NOT let "WIDE" steal "ideas". :-)
Indeed, it may be possible to
Gentlemen,
This is way out of scope of the IPsec mailing list. Please take this discussion
elsewhere.
Best regards,
Yaron
> -Original Message-
> From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Tadayuki Abraham HATTORI
> Sent: Thursday, September 17,
Paul Hoffman writes:
> Greetings again. This message starts the WG Last Call on
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-aes-ctr-ikev2-02.txt. Please read the draft and
> comment on the list whether or not you think it is ready for
> standardization. We are particularly interested in hearing from
> implementers who ha
I've now done my AD review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility-08.
I have two substantive comments, and a bunch of minor clarifications/nits.
The substantive comments first:
- A question: did the WG discuss the pros and cons of integrity
protecting the WESP header? (This does make WESP m
At 2:23 PM +0300 9/17/09, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>When reading the roadmap I noticed that camellia-ctr is also not
>defined for IKEv2 SAs, so I was wondering if the text in this document
>could be made generic enough so any counter mode cipher could be used.
It is not clear to me that future counter
At 3:51 PM +0300 9/16/09, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>For example the text could look something like this:
>--
Yoav, does Tero's proposed new text work for you?
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Redirect Mechanism for IKEv2 '
as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Tim Polk and Pasi Eronen.
A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://
We are having a conference call next Tuesday, September 22, 15:00 GMT (18:00
Israel, 17:00 CET, 11:00 EDT, 8:00 PDT), for 2 hours. It will have the same
format as the previous time: a VoIP conference bridge and posted slides. Paul
will post details separately about the TeamSpeak server.
The pla
This is to begin a 2 week working group last call for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01. The target status for this document
is Informational.
Please send your comments to the ipsec list by Oct. 1, 2009, as follow-ups to
this message.
Note that this document has had very little review
Yoav (and also Raj),
Thanks for the clarification. The text in 4301 makes sense. What I do not
agree with is the text in 4945 that requires implementations MUST be able
to perform matching based on a bitwise comparison of the entire DN in ID to
its entry in the SPD. I can agree with saying tha
By the time we re-spin RFC 4945, and I'm not saying that we will, it will look
silly specifying stuff for IKEv1, so that section will probably be omitted.
On Sep 17, 2009, at 11:48 PM, David Wierbowski wrote:
Yoav (and also Raj),
Thanks for the clarification. The text in 4301 makes sense. What
On Sep 17, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 3:51 PM +0300 9/16/09, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>> For example the text could look something like this:
>> --
>
> Yoav, does Tero's proposed new text work for you?
>
> --Paul Hoffm
At 10:03 PM +0300 9/12/09, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> The ipsecme WG will have a virtual interim WG meeting in about a month. We
> will have a conference call on Tuesday September 22, 15:00 GMT (18:00
> Israel, 17:00 CET, 11:00 EDT, 8:00 PDT), for 2 hours. We are planning on
> the same format as the pr
13 matches
Mail list logo