Scott C Moonen writes:
> Tero, I don't understand. Two weeks ago you said:
> > If you use that kind of halfway up IKE SA for sending INFORMATIONAL
> > message to other end (who thinks the IKE SA is up and valid), then I
> > agree that sending both N(AUTHENTICATION_FAILED) and DELETE would be
> > t
David Wierbowski writes:
> I agree with what you stated here, but I feel you are addressing something
> that is not limited to a simultaneous rekey of the IKE SA. It deals with
> any
> rekey of an IKE SA. In my opinion the text is misplaced and should be in a
> section that deals with handling of
