Re: [IPsec] Transform IDs for AES-GMAC in IKEv1

2009-10-13 Thread Pasi.Eronen
This took a bit longer than expected, but the IKEv1 transform IDs have now been allocated by IANA, and they're listed in errata for RFC 4543: http://www.iana.org/assignments/isakmp-registry http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4543eid=1821 (Big thanks to Tero for his help with the

Re: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01

2009-10-13 Thread Yaron Sheffer
Hi everyone, To date we've had only two last call reviews of this document. Please consider this a personal invitation to be the lucky third. We simply cannot advance the document unless we're convinced it's had adequate review. We are hereby extending the WGLC by another 2 weeks, until Oct.

Re: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01

2009-10-13 Thread Nicolas Williams
Note: I did not review the appendix nor its sub-sections. ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Re: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01

2009-10-13 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:34:24PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: Done. One more comment: - State keeping by intermediate nodes is described as an optimization, however: a) I'm not sure that that necessarily follows, since state keeping and cache index lookups are not free, and anyways,

Re: [IPsec] WG last call: draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-01

2009-10-13 Thread Paul Hoffman
Thanks, Nico! However... At 1:35 PM -0500 10/13/09, Nicolas Williams wrote: Note: I did not review the appendix nor its sub-sections. Please do. :-) Seriously, folks, the appendix is pretty important, inasmuch as some developers will pay more attention to it than they do the main body. It

[IPsec] Request for review on two IPsec-related documents

2009-10-13 Thread Paul Hoffman
Ron Bonica, one of the IETF's Operations and Management ADs, is asking for reviews of draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-term and draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-meth. Yaron and I have mentioned them at various meetings. These docs have been wandering forwards in the Benchmarking WG for many (many!) years, and are

[IPsec] Seeking interest in new charter items for the IPsecME WG

2009-10-13 Thread Paul Hoffman
Greetings again. As Yaron and I have said many times in the past, when a few of our WG documents have been completed, we can think about adding additional items to our charter. We think that we will soon be at that point. For new items to be considered in the WG, we need to have an existing,

Re: [IPsec] AD review comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-traffic-visibility

2009-10-13 Thread gabriel montenegro
Just to make sure this does not fall through the cracks: we've submitted rev 09 last week to address the AD review comments per discussion on the mailing list and at the virtual interim. - Original Message From: Yaron Sheffer yar...@checkpoint.com To: Tero Kivinen kivi...@iki.fi;