Tero's proposed tree structure would not fit in an RFC without trimming even
more, making it even less readable. I have used Alfred's proposed layout, but I
changed the example to match it. Please: read the example and make sure that
the illustration is correct:
For example, one such
Hi. Another week, another 5 issues to discuss.
Issue #159 - Payload processing order within messages
=
(3.1) Clarify that the text:
Payloads are processed in the order in which
they appear in an IKE message by invoking
Issue #161 should have referred to 2.21.2, not to 2.21. But reading the text
again, I am happy with the way it's worded in -07.
Thanks,
Yaron
-Original Message-
From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Yoav Nir
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010
