Thanks for being so prompt. I'll mark it as verified.
spt
On 11/27/11 1:34 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
+1
On Nov 27, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Charlie Kaufman wrote:
I believe this errata should be marked Verified. This is pretty clearly a
case where the document was updated in one place and a needed
On Nov 21, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Stephen Hanna wrote:
The conclusion of Wednesday night's P2P VPN side meeting
was that we would start a new thread on the proposed
ipsecme charter change and resolve the open questions
by email. Let's start off with the text that came out
of Wednesday's meeting
I believe this errata should be marked Verified. This is pretty clearly a
case where the document was updated in one place and a needed corresponding
update in another place was missed.
--Charlie
-Original Message-
From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org]
