Hi again. The response has so far been underwhelming. As I said in my previous message, I'm perfectly willing to go the individual route, but I think this would be a shame. The protocol extension described can have applications in both remote access VPN (opening multiple tunnels with multiple gateways) and in seamless roaming between remote access VPN and local area wireless networks.
I also think that it touches a lot of different areas, and would benefit from the input of people better versed than me in the needs of cellular providers and AAA. I am CC-ing the HOKEY mailing list (as I should have done earlier) because this draft actually adapts IKE to work with their protocol, and they may be willing to review and contribute, even if this is IPsecME work. So if any of you are interested, and are willing to review, please let us know. Yoav & Qin On Apr 12, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Apr 12, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Yoav Nir wrote: > >> We would like this working group to accept this, and have it added to >> charter. Of course, if it gets accepted, we volunteer to be authors. If it >> is not accepted, we will try to progress it as an individual submission, but >> we believe that this changes IKE enough that it should come from the working >> group. > > > Statements of interest and disinterest on this document are welcome. If you > prefer to make such a statement off-list please send it to me or Yaron. > > A statement of interest that include a promise to review in WG LC count for > more than a bare statement of interest. _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
