Hi,
I do not know if this is the right place for posting my question, but I hope
so. If not, I am very sorry for the inconvenience.
I just started digging me into the topic of PF_KEY and the manually
manipulation of the SAD and SPD from the user land of Linux. My problem is
finding
Hi Zhang,
Thanks for going through the RFC 6311 .
I have gone through your proposed draft and felt that there is some confusion
regarding the message id concept of ikev2.
I have seen that in section 2.3 you were comparing the higer sender value of x2
with y2.
That is wrong. when x2 proposes
Hi Yaron
Responses are inline.
Yoav
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Hi Yoav,
thank you for the new draft. A few comments:
- Please mention the question of IKE keepalive messages (liveness
check). Do you expect these messages to each be on a new connection? Or
to
Hi Yoav,
please see below.
Thanks,
Yaron
On 06/14/2012 08:39 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
Hi Yaron
Responses are inline.
Yoav
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Hi Yoav,
thank you for the new draft. A few comments:
- Please mention the question of IKE keepalive messages
On 06/14/12 13:39, Yoav Nir wrote:
Hi Yaron
Responses are inline.
Yoav
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Hi Yoav,
thank you for the new draft. A few comments:
- Please mention the question of IKE keepalive messages (liveness
check). Do you expect these messages to each be
On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:34 PM, John Leser wrote:
On 06/14/12 13:39, Yoav Nir wrote:
Hi Yaron
Responses are inline.
Yoav
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Hi Yoav,
thank you for the new draft. A few comments:
- Please mention the question of IKE keepalive
On 06/14/12 16:25, Yoav Nir wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:34 PM, John Leser wrote:
On 06/14/12 13:39, Yoav Nir wrote:
Hi Yaron
Responses are inline.
Yoav
On Jun 14, 2012, at 1:40 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Hi Yoav,
thank you for the new draft. A few comments:
- Please mention the
