+1 to "now that you understand it, please show where you were confused before"
so that we can close out the document and move it to the IETF.
--Paul Hoffman
On Apr 9, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Dan Brown [mailto:dbr...@certi
On Apr 9, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Dan Harkins wrote:
> I think it looks fine and I have a nit that the authors can ignore
> if they like.
>
> I don't like the fact that RFC 5903 does not list a specific value for
> "a" in the parameter set definition and instead just says -3 in the
> equation for th
> "Paul" == Paul Hoffman writes:
Paul> +1 to "now that you understand it, please show where you were
Paul> confused before" so that we can close out the document and
Paul> move it to the IETF.
sorry, day job got in the way.
rereading section 2.1/2.2 again.
This leakage can
