Hi Michael,
formally yes, we only need 2 weeks' notice for a conference call:
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/interim-meetings.html
But the date is not (yet) set in stone. Let us know if you cannot attend
for any reason.
Thanks,
Yaron
On 2013-04-28 03:17, Michael Richardson wrot
Hi Yaron,
The issue is that it has to be announcement by the IESG secretary 2
weeks in advance.
End of last year I suggested to simplify the rules for virtual interim
meetings but my proposal was not well received, see
http://list-archives.org/2012/12/03/ietf-ietf-org/simplifying-our-process
It's much simpler than that: I'm fine with the process, I just got my
numbers wrong (blush). May 7 is less than 2 weeks in the future.
Instead, I'd like to propose Thursday, May 16, same time. Any objections?
Thanks,
Yaron
On 2013-04-28 12:07, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Hi Yaron,
The
Hi Toby,
I absolutely understand the rational of where you are coming from. I agree
with questions raised by Paul - we need to be characterize the requirement
a bit further.
I know QoS is important especially if there is an overload of traffic with
multiple different use cases. However do we see
