Please incorporate the QoS issue brought up by Toby. I'd like to make
sure we have everything in the draft that the WG wants before issuing
the WGLC. I also think the TSV/RTG directorates/ADs will be interested
in that.
Can you explain the rationale for the following the changes to
requirem
Dear IPsec folks,
The ipsecme working group is chartered to come up with a solution for
transporting long IKEv2 messages over networks that do not perform IP
fragmentation correctly, and as a result drop overly long messages,
usually IKE_AUTH messages.
Our original plan was to base the solut
Nicely written that makes it so much easier to review. Thanks.
My comments in no particular order:
1. This document updates RFC 5996. I know one of my fellow ADs will ask
why this is an updates before they get to s2. Can we add something to
the introduction that says "This document updates
