Hi,
As promised, we just had a virtual interim meeting to discuss IKEv2
fragmentation. Please see the minutes below (thanks Paul!).
Following up on this meeting, we would like to confirm the decision on
the mailing list:
- The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an
On Thu, 16 May 2013, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
As promised, we just had a virtual interim meeting to discuss IKEv2
fragmentation. Please see the minutes below (thanks Paul!).
Following up on this meeting, we would like to confirm the decision on the
mailing list:
- The group still thinks this
Hi list,
I approve of using draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation as a
starting for IKEv2 fragmentation.
Regards
Andreas
==
Andreas Steffen andreas.stef...@strongswan.org
strongSwan - the Open
Yaron Sheffer writes:
- The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an
interoperable solution.
- We would like to abandon the work on IKE-over-TCP.
- And to work on IKEv2 protocol-level fragmentation, using
draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation as a starting point.
Hi,
I approved the conclusion.
Regards,
Valery.
- The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an
interoperable solution.
- We would like to abandon the work on IKE-over-TCP.
- And to work on IKEv2 protocol-level fragmentation, using
+1
On May 16, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Valery Smyslov sva...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I approved the conclusion.
Regards,
Valery.
- The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an
interoperable solution.
- We would like to abandon the work on IKE-over-TCP.
- And to work
On May 16, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As promised, we just had a virtual interim meeting to discuss IKEv2
fragmentation. Please see the minutes below (thanks Paul!).
Following up on this meeting, we would like to confirm the decision on the
