Re: [IPsec] Editorial changes to RFC5996

2013-10-19 Thread Yaron Sheffer
Hi Yaron, Hi Valery, Sorry for being the Bad Guy on this. Your #6 does not seem editorial to I think that current text is not aligned with RFC4301. We may leave it as is or try to find other form that would not appear so misaligned. Your new text is fine, if we leave it at that. If we try t

Re: [IPsec] Editorial changes to RFC5996

2013-10-19 Thread Yoav Nir
Hi, Yaron Suppose that instead of sending the message to the list yesterday, Valery had submitted his comments as errata a few months ago, before Sean asked us to do the revision. Would those errata not have been verified? If so (and I think it's true for at least #3, #4, #7, and #11, and #6 wo

Re: [IPsec] Editorial changes to RFC5996

2013-10-19 Thread Yaron Sheffer
Hi Yoav, You're probably right in your speculation. But my point was that Valery's subject line said "editorial changes", and two of these changes were arguably non-editorial. Technical changes would be treated differently in an errata review and should be treated differently in a "bis" docum