How about:
OLD:
The Pad Length field need not exceed 4 octets. However, RFC 4303 and this
specification do not
prohibit using greater pad lengths.
NEW:
The length of the Padding field need not exceed 4 octets. However, neither
RFC 4303 nor this
specification require using the
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
Working Group of the IETF.
Title : ChaCha20, Poly1305 and their use in IKE IPsec
Author : Yoav Nir
Quick nit: the sentence The Pad Length field need not exceed 4 octets
is a bit confusing, because the Pad Length field is obviously a constant
2 octets. I would suggest The Padding field's length (and the value of
the Pad Length field) need not exceed 4 octets.
Thanks,
Yaron
On
Sure.
On 06/14/2015 02:11 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
How about:
OLD:
The Pad Length field need not exceed 4 octets. However, RFC 4303 and this
specification do not
prohibit using greater pad lengths.
NEW:
The length of the Padding field need not exceed 4 octets. However, neither
RFC
Done.
On Jun 14, 2015, at 8:57 PM, Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure.
On 06/14/2015 02:11 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
How about:
OLD:
The Pad Length field need not exceed 4 octets. However, RFC 4303 and this
specification do not
prohibit using greater pad lengths.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
Working Group of the IETF.
Title : ChaCha20, Poly1305 and their use in IKE IPsec
Author : Yoav Nir
