Hi,
I am also supporting the draft as a co-author.
Yours,
Daniel
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 5:03 PM, David Schinazi wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I strongly support adoption of this document.
> I have read it and implemented it.
> The document reads well, and allows independent implementations.
> I per
So I have proposed earlier that we should mix the ppk to SK_d, SK_pi,
and SK_pr, i.e., something like this:
SKEYSEED = prf(Ni | Nr, g^ir)
{SK_d' | SK_ai | SK_ar | SK_ei | SK_er | SK_pi' | SK_pr'}
= prf+ (SKEYSEED, Ni | Nr | SPIi | SPIr)
If no
Here are the preliminary minutes of the IPsecME meeting in Chicago.
Send corrections, and additions etc to me.
Thanks to Michael and Tommy for taking the minutes.
--
IPSECme meeting.
IETF98.
Tero and David as Chairs.
Room Montreu
Here is the current status of the working group documents:
--
Document Status:
- draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis (David)
Approved. Revised ID already done.
- draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis (David)
Approved. Revised ID needed.
Hello all,
I strongly support adoption of this document.
I have read it and implemented it.
The document reads well, and allows independent implementations.
I personally think Implicit IV is a great step forward for IKEv2/IPsec, even
outside of IoT.
Regards,
David Schinazi
> On Mar 29, 2017, a
Not surprising (me being a co-author) but I support adoption.
> On 29 Mar 2017, at 16:44, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> As discussed in the meeting, we are starting two week working group
> adoptation call for the draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv.
>
> Please read the draft and send your comments to thi
As discussed in the meeting, we are starting two week working group
adoptation call for the draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv.
Please read the draft and send your comments to this list, and also
tell if you support adoptation of this draft as WG draft.
The document is available at
https://datatracke
Hello all,
I strongly support the WG adoption of this draft.
Regards,
David Schinazi
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 14:17, IETF Secretariat
> wrote:
>
>
> The IPSECME WG has placed draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv in state
> Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tero Kivinen)
>
> The document i
The IPSECME WG has placed draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tero Kivinen)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-ipsecme-implicit-iv/
___
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Security Maintenance and Extensions of the
IETF.
Title : Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage
Guidance for IKEv2
Authors : Yoav Nir
Hello,
If you have an implementation to standards or drafts for this WG,
please considering entering them into CodeStand. Listing can be to
open source or proprietary implementations, where the open source ones
would link to code repositories. Before entering your code project,
check to see if t
This LGTM
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Daniel Migault <
daniel.miga...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> I am planning to add this reference.Let me know if you prefer another
> reference.
>
> Rizzo, J. and T. Duong. "Here come the xor ninjas", 2011.
> http://netifera.com/research/beast/beast_DRAFT_062
I am planning to add this reference.Let me know if you prefer another
reference.
Rizzo, J. and T. Duong. "Here come the xor ninjas", 2011.
http://netifera.com/research/beast/beast_DRAFT_0621.pdf.
Thanks for the feed back.
Yours,
Daniel
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
I think Yoav's suggestion to cite BEAST as evidence that predictable IVs
are bad is a good plan.
-Ekr
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Migault <
daniel.miga...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thank you for the review and comments. Do you have any preference on what
> we should cite
Hi Eric,
Thank you for the review and comments. Do you have any preference on what
we should cite for the chosen clear text attack?: Our local version
currently refers to Security Consideration of RFC3602.
The sentence in the terminology section mentioning that IV are usually
unpredictable has b
15 matches
Mail list logo
