Pål Dammvik writes:
> Think I have discovered a small inconsistency in RFC 7296 with
> regards to the actions a node shall take if it received ESP packets
> with an unknown SPI.
Those cases are not exactly same. I.e., the section 1.5 explictly
talks about receiving ESP packet with unknown SPI. The
Changed milestone "IETF Last Call on Split-DNS Configuration for IKEv2", set
due date to April 2018 from February 2017.
Changed milestone "IETF Last Call on Implicit IV in IPsec", set due date to
April 2018 from February 2017.
Changed milestone "IETF Last Call on partially quantum resistant IKEv2
Think I have discovered a small inconsistency in RFC 7296 with regards to the
actions a node shall take if it received ESP packets with an unknown SPI.
In section 1.5 it’s stated:
“In the first case, if the receiving node has an active IKE SA to the IP
address from whence the packet came, it MAY
