Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-08

2023-02-19 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Paul, > > ** Section 3.2. Is the RESERVED field 2 or 3 octets? Figure 2 and 3 says > > two and the text says three. > > I guess two. But a more interesting question is, why are there RESERVED Exactly. > octets there to begin with ? I don't feel this CP payload would get > extended and inste

Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-08

2023-02-19 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Roman, thank you for the review, please see inline. > Hi > > I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-08. Thanks for this > document. Below is my > feedback: > > ** Section 3.1 > > Section 3.1.5 of > [I-D.ietf-add-dnr] lists a set of service parameters that are > recommended

Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-add-ike-08

2023-02-19 Thread Paul Wouters
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023, Roman Danyliw wrote: ** Section 3.1 Section 3.1.5 of [I-D.ietf-add-dnr] lists a set of service parameters that are recommended to be supported by implementations. The referenced section in draft-ietf-add-dnr provides MTI and RECOMMENDED options. Are both of these applicab