To: IPsecme WG
Subject: [IPsec] Call for agenda items
Greetings again. We have a 2-hour time slot in Atlanta, which is way more
than we asked for. We don't need to be talking about
draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem because it's finished with WG LC and is
being sent to the AD for review
Hi,
I would also like to have a slot to present our ongoing work on IPsec and
Multiple Interfaces. One of the document is also presented in MIF. I will
update the document presented to MIF by end of next week.
Best Regards,
Daniel
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Paul Hoffman
Paul Hoffman writes:
Tero: even though you are taking draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-minimal
to the LWIG WG, could you do a similar presentation on the problems
that your document solves for the IPsecME WG? Yaron and I suspect
that there is overlap, and having good lists of the similarities and
Paul Hoffman writes:
Greetings again. We have a 2-hour time slot in Atlanta, which is way
more than we asked for. We don't need to be talking about
draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem because it's finished with WG LC
and is being sent to the AD for review. This is a call for agenda
items.
On Oct 17, 2012, at 5:32 PM, Dan Harkins dhark...@lounge.org wrote:
I would be happy to discuss IKEv3. Please let me know if you'll put me
on the agenda and I'll prepare some slides to talk to.
It would be good if you put together a short (less than 15 minutes)
presentation on your
A quick correction: the latest version of the now-finished draft has
been renamed draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem (auto-discovery VPN,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem-00).
Thanks,
Yaron
On 10/17/2012 04:38 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings again. We
On Oct 17, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com wrote:
A quick correction: the latest version of the now-finished draft has been
renamed draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem (auto-discovery VPN,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem-00).
Whoops, yes. An
On Oct 17, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings again. We have a 2-hour time slot in Atlanta, which is way more
than we asked for. We don't need to be talking about
draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem because it's finished with WG LC and is
being sent to the AD for review.
Are
On Wed, October 17, 2012 7:38 am, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Greetings again. We have a 2-hour time slot in Atlanta, which is way more
than we asked for. We don't need to be talking about
draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem because it's finished with WG LC and is
being sent to the AD for review. This
We have one active draft, and that might take up most of our hour. However, we
have often had time to have short (5 minutes or less) quick presentations on
other topics. A proposed agenda is:
5 min: WG intro
45 min: draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem issues
5 min:
10 matches
Mail list logo