Hi Sean,
Here is the latest draft with your comments incorporated.
WG/ Toby,
I have added one last requirement number 15 into the document for QoS.
Based on inputs from the WG, we can add/ remove/ or update the requirement.
Thanks,
Vishwas
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
On 6/3/13 1:02 PM, Vishwas Manral wrote:
Hi Sean,
My comments are inline:
Please incorporate the QoS issue brought up by Toby.I'd like to make
sure we have everything in the draft that the WG wants before issuing
the WGLC.I also think the TSV/RTG directorates/ADs will be interested
in that.
Hi Sean,
My comments are inline:
Please incorporate the QoS issue brought up by Toby. I'd like to make
sure we have everything in the draft that the WG wants before issuing
the WGLC. I also think the TSV/RTG directorates/ADs will be interested
in that.
VM> I can incorporate it if the Work
Hi Paul,
I will try to get this done around the first week of June. I am currently
travelling till the end of the week.
Thanks,
Vishwas
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Document authors: when might we have the update so Sean can move this
> forwards? We are gated on this
Document authors: when might we have the update so Sean can move this forwards?
We are gated on this before we solicit AD-VPN protocols.
--Paul Hoffman
On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
> Please incorporate the QoS issue brought up by Toby. I'd like to make sure
> we have every
Please incorporate the QoS issue brought up by Toby. I'd like to make
sure we have everything in the draft that the WG wants before issuing
the WGLC. I also think the TSV/RTG directorates/ADs will be interested
in that.
Can you explain the rationale for the following the changes to
requirem
