:08 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: Tero Kivinen ; Valery Smyslov ;
ipsec@ietf.org ; Valery Smyslov
Subject: Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-06
Hi Roman,
We have updated our draft to incorporate Russ' feedback and also changes from
IANA review. it also include
Hi Roman,
We have updated our draft to incorporate Russ' feedback and also changes
from IANA review. it also includes the following changes following your
suggestions.
The updated draft is available here
https://github.com/post-quantum/ietf-pq-ikev2/blob/master/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-k
Hi Tero,
> Roman Danyliw writes:
> > ** Section 3.2.4.
> >
> > The responder MUST handle this
> >situation gracefully and delete the associated state if it does not
> >receive the next expected IKE_FOLLOWUP_KE request after some
> >reasonable period of time.
> >
> >
Roman Danyliw writes:
> ** Section 3.2.4.
>
> The responder MUST handle this
>situation gracefully and delete the associated state if it does not
>receive the next expected IKE_FOLLOWUP_KE request after some
>reasonable period of time.
>
> Is there a gui
: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-06
[snip]
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 23:20, Roman Danyliw
mailto:r...@cert.org>> wrote:
[snip]
** Section 2
Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) compliance.
IPsec is widely used in Federal Information Systems an
Hi!
From: CJ Tjhai
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 9:05 PM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: Valery Smyslov ; ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-06
Hi Roman,
Many thanks for the review, really appreciate it. We will update our draft and
submit a revision
Hi Roman,
Many thanks for the review, really appreciate it. We will update our draft
and submit a revision soon.
Please see our response inline below.
Best wishes,
CJ and Valery
On Fri, 30 Sept 2022 at 23:20, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2
Hi Adreas!
> -Original Message-
> From: IPsec On Behalf Of Andreas Steffen
> Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2022 7:29 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-06
>
> On 01.10.22 00:19
On 01.10.22 00:19, Roman Danyliw wrote:
** Question 4
Several implementors have been integral in developing this document, thus
implementors have indicated interest in implementing this. There is already
at least two interoperable implementations of this specification.
Could these implementati
Hi!
I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-06. Thanks
for the work on this document.
Per the shepherd write-up:
** Question 4
Several implementors have been integral in developing this document, thus
implementors have indicated interest in implementing this. There i
10 matches
Mail list logo
