Re: [IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: (with COMMENT)

2020-01-06 Thread Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
; draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ik...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: (with COMMENT) Hi Alissa, > -- > COMMENT: > --

Re: [IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: (with COMMENT)

2020-01-06 Thread Valery Smyslov
Hi Alissa, > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > I think this document should formally update RFC 7296. Was that discussed > in the WG? I don't think it is necessary. This d

Re: [IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: (with COMMENT)

2020-01-06 Thread Paul Wouters
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker wrote: I think this document should formally update RFC 7296. Was that discussed in the WG? Extensions do not update the core RFC, unless they change behaviour specified in that core RFC. That is, someone implementing the core RFC should know a

[IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: (with COMMENT)

2020-01-06 Thread Alissa Cooper via Datatracker
Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to