On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) wrote:
Since there were no concerns raised about adopting this draft, this draft has
been adopted as an IPSecME working group draft. Authors, please post the next
version as draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-00.
Done,
Paul
Since there were no concerns raised about adopting this draft, this draft has
been adopted as an IPSecME working group draft. Authors, please post the next
version as draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc7321bis-00.
Thanks,
Dave and Tero
> -Original Message-
> From: Waltermire, David A. (Fed)
> Sent:
Hi,
I support adoption of this document.
Regards,
Valery.
This is a quick reminder that the call for WG adoption on draft-mglt-ipsecme-rfc7321bis ends on Wednesday, September
14th, 2016 at UTC 23:59.
I have not seen any support or concerns posted in response to my initial email. While this
This is a quick reminder that the call for WG adoption on
draft-mglt-ipsecme-rfc7321bis ends on Wednesday, September 14th, 2016 at UTC
23:59.
I have not seen any support or concerns posted in response to my initial email.
While this document has received support in past meetings and discussion,
This is the call for adoption of
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mglt-ipsecme-rfc7321bis/ as an IPSecME
working group (WG) document.
By adopting this draft, the WG is agreeing to take this on as an official WG
item to continue work on the draft. Please reply to this message with any
co
