Hi All,
One comment/request on the IKEv2bis draft.
One of the differences between RFC 4306 and the IKEv2bis draft is in Section
2.17, Generating Key Material for Child SAs. Appendix E.2 of the IKEv2bis
draft indicates the following:
In Section 2.17, removed "If multiple IPsec protocols
regards,
Pasi
(not wearing any hats)
> -Original Message-
> From: Emre Ertekin
> Sent: 15 August, 2009 00:54
> To: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: [IPsec] Comment/Request on IKEv2bis Draft
> Hi All,
>
> One comment/request on the IKEv2bis draft.
>
>
> One of the
pasi.ero...@nokia.com writes:
> The original text in RFC 4306 was slightly confusing, but I think we
> should leave room for ROHCoIPsec here. Perhaps adding something like
> this after the bulleted list?
>
>If the Child SA negotiation includes some future IPsec protocol(s)
>in addition to
protocols are taken in the order
>in which the protocol headers will appear in the encapsulated
>packet.
>
> Best regards,
> Pasi
> (not wearing any hats)
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Emre Ertekin
> > Sent: 15 August, 2009 00:54
> > T
