ke Sullenberger (mls)
> Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] DMVPN thoughts
>
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 01:41:36 +
> "Mike Sullenberger (mls)" wrote:
>
> > Thank you very much for your comments. I had not realized that
> > anyone had tried to implemen
; I have a couple of comments, inline.
Likewise.
> > From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Timo Teras
> > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 12:05 PM
> > To: ipsec@ietf.org
> > Subject: [IPsec] DMVPN thoughts
> >
> >[snip]
> > However, after brie
:.:|:.
Customer Advocacy CISCO
> -Original Message-
> From: IPsec [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Timo Teras
> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 12:05 PM
> To: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: [IPsec] DMVPN thoughts
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Yaron Sheffer r
Hi everyone,
Yaron Sheffer recently invited my to share my thoughts on DMVPN as it
seems to be one of the option being considered to be the AD VPN
standard.
As brief background, I am the author of opennhrp [1] which can be used
to implement Cisco DMVPN style networks on Linux [2]. I have also
wri
