At 4:01 PM +0200 1/19/10, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>I do not think they are different cases.
On further staring at this, I agree, and I agree that your rewording is fine.
Done.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
___
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
Paul Hoffman writes:
> In section 2.19 there is FAILED_CP_REQUIRED text twice:
>
>The FAILED_CP_REQUIRED notification is sent by responder in the case
>where CP(CFG_REQUEST) was expected but not received, and so is a
>conflict with locally configured policy. There is no associated
>
