"
To: ;
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 5:25 PM
Subject: [IPsec] HOKEY draft draft-ietf-hokey-rfc5296bis
> Hi all
>
> I have just read the subject draft, and found this in section 6 (and similar
> text in the introduction):
>
> Note that to support ERP, lower-layer s
On Mar 7, 2011, at 5:58 PM, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Yoav Nir writes:
>> A bigger problem is that this text says that IKEv2 needs to be
>> updated, but there is no draft for this update, nor has there been
>> any message to this list about this proposed change.
>>
>> The simple change they requir
Yoav Nir writes:
> A bigger problem is that this text says that IKEv2 needs to be
> updated, but there is no draft for this update, nor has there been
> any message to this list about this proposed change.
>
> The simple change they require is to section 3.16:
>o Code (1 octet) indicates wh
On Mar 6, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>
> There's peer-initiated ERP (which would require peer-initiated IKE?) and
> multiple simultaneous operations. I think it may come to a somewhat larger
> draft.
Sorry. peer=remote access client, so peer-initiated IKE is the norm. They real
chang
Hi all
I have just read the subject draft, and found this in section 6 (and similar
text in the introduction):
Note that to support ERP, lower-layer specifications may need to be
revised. Specifically, the IEEE802.1x specification must be revised
to allow carrying EAP messages of the n
