Matthew Cini Sarreo writes:
> I would like to ask the reason behind this. As "live peer detection" is done
> by sending an empty INFORMATIONAL exchange (Encrypted Payload with no
> payloads), wouldn't it better to have a response be constructed in such a
> way so that the requesting peer can explic
t; on the responsder. If it doesn't match, it's an
invalid message.
From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Matthew Cini Sarreo
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 12:52 PM
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: [IPsec] IKEv2: Ques
Hello,
While reading through ikev2 bis 02 (this is most certainly not something new
that surfaced in this document), section 1.4, par 3 states:
"Messages in an INFORMATIONAL exchange contain zero or more Notification,
Delete, and Configuration payloads. The Recipient of an INFORMATIONAL
exchange
