OK. there were zero responses to this. Since this seems obvious to me, I will
correct it as Scott suggests, and close the issue with the publication of -01.
On Sep 21, 2010, at 2:58 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
Hi all.
We're starting discussions of the issues that are open for the failure
Yoav,
Just for posterity, I agree with Scott's suggestion.
Dave Wierbowski
From: Yoav Nir y...@checkpoint.com
To: IPsecme WG ipsec@ietf.org
Date: 09/30/2010 04:20 PM
Subject:Re: [IPsec] Issue #189 - Reply is not needed for unprotected
message containing
Hi all.
We're starting discussions of the issues that are open for the failure
detection draft.
Reported by Scott C Moonen:
What is the purpose of sending an empty response to the unprotected
N(INVALID[_IKE]_SPI)N(QCD_TOKEN)+ message? I'm not sure it provides any real
value and would
