On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 11:22:07PM -0400, John Leser wrote:
particular destination seems unworkable. It would be more
reasonable, and probably more useful, for a client to automatically
locate the nearest VPN server to itself (that alone would be an
interesting and potentially useful
Hi Izaac/ John,
Thanks for the great inputs you provide. I agree we may not see changes in
the way packets would traverse the network in either the transport/ tunnel
mode.
Like you mention Routing in such topologies is an issue for sure
(especially in the Hub and Spoke topology) and there are
Hi everybody,
Vishwas Manral has agreed to join Steve Hanna as co-author of this
draft, now at -00 (
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem-00). I'd
like to thank them both.
While Vishwas and Steve are busy working on the next version, feel free
to read and comment
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:46:24PM +0300, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
While Vishwas and Steve are busy working on the next version, feel
free to read and comment on the current version.
In what way is this problem not addressed by transport mode, despite
it's being far less commonly deployed?
But
On 05/08/12 22:17, Izaac wrote:
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:46:24PM +0300, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
While Vishwas and Steve are busy working on the next version, feel
free to read and comment on the current version.
In what way is this problem not addressed by transport mode, despite
it's being
