,
** **
Steve
** **
*From:* Vishwas Manral [mailto:vishwas.i...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 06, 2012 5:23 PM
*To:* Stephen Hanna
*Cc:* IPsecme WG
*Subject:* Re: [IPsec] Please Comment on New P2P VPN Problem Statement
** **
Hi Steve,
I agree to the need of standardization
In case you didn't notice, I have posted the -00 version
of the P2P VPN problem statement. The URL is below.
Please review and comment.
I'm especially interested in getting feedback on the
use cases in this document. As previously agreed, they
are based on the use cases in section 2.2 of the
Hi Steve,
I agree to the need of standardization for a large scale point-to-point
solution.
1. I guess the problem statement is not just about lessening the number of
configuration commands but also the fact that static configuration may not
work in some cases. The spokes may get new addresses
Yes, please do comment on the draft. Before commenting, read the whole draft.
For extra points: start different threads of the comments with different
subject lines.
We will discuss this draft at the upcoming IETF meeting in Paris. By discuss,
I do *not* mean have the draft introduced to us: I
