Yoav Nir ynir.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this diagram correct:
some comment on the accuracy of my diagram would be appreciated :-)
I think that the IANA considerations of ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305
should say
something like,
According to cfrg-chacha20, Poly-1305 is not
On Apr 28, 2015, at 4:09 PM, Michael Richardson mcr+i...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Yoav Nir ynir.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this diagram correct:
some comment on the accuracy of my diagram would be appreciated :-)
I’ll get to that later.
I think that the IANA considerations of
On Apr 27, 2015, at 6:25 PM, Michael Richardson mcr+i...@sandelman.ca wrote:
I read draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305 on Friday last, and then found
that I needed to further review draft-nir-cfrg-chacha20-poly1305-06 to better
understand the questions in para 2 of the security
Valery Smyslov writes:
I thought so as well. In the meantime, the TLS working group is discussing
the same thing for TLS 1.3, and they are proposing to get rid of the salt
(or IV) for AES-GCM as well as ChaCha20.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg15884.html
AFAIK
Hi Yoav,
Hi, Valery.
Thanks for the review. See my reply inline.
Technical issues.
1. For the question raised in the draft:
TBD: do we want an extra 32 bits as salt for the nonce like
in GCM, or keep the salt (=SenderID) at zero?
I prefer to follow GCM-like approach, i.e. to take
Hi, Valery.
Thanks for the review. See my reply inline.
On Apr 21, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Valery Smyslov sva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
this is my review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-02.
I think that the draft is in a good shape. A few issues need to be resolved.
Technical
Hi,
this is my review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305-02.
I think that the draft is in a good shape. A few issues need to be resolved.
Technical issues.
1. For the question raised in the draft:
TBD: do we want an extra 32 bits as salt for the nonce like
in GCM, or keep the
Greetings. We have a new short draft in the WG, and would like to get reviews
soon so we can move it into WG Last Call in about two weeks. We are not in a
rush, but we also don't need to delay this too much.
We have five committed reviewers, but it would very useful if we had a few
more. If
