On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 14:35 -0400, Dan McDonald wrote:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 01:02:20PM -0500, Joy Latten wrote:
SNIP!
I am thinking it can be concluded that responder computed MACedIDForR with
1's in the RESERVED field.
That seems valid (though clearly the implementation who sends 1s
I have a question about RESERVED field and its influence on
AUTH payload.
Suppose responder sends and IKE_AUTH message whose IDr payload has 1's in
the RESERVED field instead of 0's.
(I know rfc says no to this, but this is in regards to
an IKEv2 TAHI testcase that tests implementation's
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 01:02:20PM -0500, Joy Latten wrote:
SNIP!
I am thinking it can be concluded that responder computed MACedIDForR with
1's in the RESERVED field.
That seems valid (though clearly the implementation who sends 1s is violating
Postel's Law, but you did say it's a TAHI
