<mailto:zhang.ruis...@zte.com.cn>
*Cc:* ipsec@ietf.org <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org> ;
ipsec-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org>
*Sent:* 20 июня 2012 г. 15:26
*Subject:* Re: [IPsec] Updates to the IKEv2 Extension for
IKEv2
blem. So when simultaneous failover
occurs, a simple two-way synchronization may not be an appropriate
solution.
"Kalyani Garigipati (kagarigi)"
发件人: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org
2012-06-14 19:14
收件人
"zhang.ruis...@zte.com.cn" , "ipsec@ietf.org"
抄送
主题
Re:
.cn
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 7:36 AM
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: [IPsec] Updates to the IKEv2 Extension for IKEv2/IPsec High Availablity
Dear All,
I've submitted a new draft " Updates to the IKEv2 Extension for IKEv2/IPsec
High Availablity". This draft analyzes some issues in R
Dear All,
I've submitted a new draft " Updates to the IKEv2 Extension for
IKEv2/IPsec High Availablity". This draft analyzes some issues in RFC
6311,
and proposes some updates. Look forward to your comments.
BR,
Ruishan Zhang___
IPsec mailing lis
