On Oct 18, 2012, at 6:31 AM, Tero Kivinen <kivi...@iki.fi> wrote: > I did send quite a lot of comments to the draft at 2012-09-10, and I > have not seen those taken into the draft yet. Also as I noted in my > email I am quite sure we are still missing some requirements, but as > the current document is bit hard to read with the terminology of > different nodes, hubs, endpoints etc so it is bit hard to understand > if all requirements are there or not. > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg07910.html > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg07914.html > > I myself do think that the draft-ietf-ipsecme-ad-vpn-problem-00 is NOT > yet ready, I have been waiting for the next version of the document > before rereading it.
You did ask for changes during WG Last Call, and the authors agreed on many of them, but then did not produce the -01 draft (and I did not notice this). I *really* hope they produce a new version before the submission cutoff on Monday; we can then either continue the discussion or send the document to IETF Last Call. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
