cate that the client is authenticated.
>
>Maybe, it is required for some extra authentication?
>
>Regards,
>Prashant
>
>-Original Message-
>From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
>Of Glen Zorn
>Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:46 PM
&g
henticated.
>
>Maybe, it is required for some extra authentication?
>
>Regards,
>Prashant
>
>-Original Message-
>From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
>Of Glen Zorn
>Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:46 PM
>To: Yoav Nir
>Cc: ipsec@ie
ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Glen Zorn
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 3:46 PM
To: Yoav Nir
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org; Prashant Batra (prbatra)
Subject: Re: [IPsec] eap-md5 based authentication
On 10/25/2011 3:35 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Hi Prashant.
>
>
On 10/25/2011 3:35 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> Hi Prashant.
>
> I think in the challenge request, the first byte is the challenge length
> (usually 16) followed by the challenge itself, and then followed by some
> server name. I guess the reasoning is that this allows the client to
> choose the correc
From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Prashant Batra (prbatra)
Sent: 24 October 2011 18:11
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: [IPsec] eap-md5 based authentication
Hello,
I am facing some problem in calculating md5-challenge response.
What I
Hello,
I am facing some problem in calculating md5-challenge response.
What I am doing is simply MD5(Identifier | | ).
The challenge response is somehow wrong.
Is it correct to say that Challenge value used as input to md5 is the
same value what is in the EAP payload (type md5-challenge
