+1
Kind Regards,
Raj
-Original Message-
From: ipsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian
Weis (bew)
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 5:25 AM
To: Yaron Sheffer
Cc: IPsecme WG
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with
yes, that was me.
Daniel
On 05/17/2013 10:08 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
On May 17, 2013, at 2:54 AM, Brian Weis wrote:
[snip]
Yaron: do we want to stay with the current TCP-based solution?
Brian: might be running on sensors that don't have a TCP stack
Someone made this comment, but it wasn
On May 17, 2013, at 2:54 AM, Brian Weis wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Yaron: do we want to stay with the current TCP-based solution?
>> Brian: might be running on sensors that don't have a TCP stack
>
> Someone made this comment, but it wasn't me.
That was Daniel.
Yoav
__
On May 16, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As promised, we just had a virtual interim meeting to discuss IKEv2
> fragmentation. Please see the minutes below (thanks Paul!).
>
> Following up on this meeting, we would like to confirm the decision on the
> mailing list:
>
> -
+1
On May 16, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Valery Smyslov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I approved the conclusion.
>
> Regards,
> Valery.
>
>> - The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an
>> interoperable solution.
>> - We would like to abandon the work on IKE-over-TCP.
>> - And to work on
Hi,
I approved the conclusion.
Regards,
Valery.
- The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an
interoperable solution.
- We would like to abandon the work on IKE-over-TCP.
- And to work on IKEv2 protocol-level fragmentation, using
draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentatio
I am supporting IKE fragmentation supported by the application and thus
support draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation.
BR
Daniel
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>
> As promised, we just had a virtual interim meeting to disc
On Thu, 16 May 2013, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
As promised, we just had a virtual interim meeting to discuss IKEv2
fragmentation. Please see the minutes below (thanks Paul!).
Following up on this meeting, we would like to confirm the decision on the
mailing list:
- The group still thinks this is
