Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?

2003-09-14 Thread Mark Smith
Hi Pekka, I haven't looked at Keith's document, but having had to develop VPN / NAT solutions, and also witnessed a number of NAT's short comings I'd be quite willing to contribute to a document like this. As an observation, it seems that a lot of "non-IETF" networking people aren't aware of t

Re: Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?

2003-09-14 Thread Tim Chown
See http://www.ist-long.com/long/045Guidelines/LONG_Trans_app_IPv6.pdf for examples of IPv4-IPv6 interactions, and where IPv4-mapped addresses are used. Tim On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:42:34AM +0530, Bhaskar S wrote: > Hi, > > Please could someone explain how IPv4 compatible IPv6 address is > use

Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?

2003-09-14 Thread Pekka Savola
Hi, Regarding the local addressing debate... I had the misfortune to having to participate in a discussion where a multiple-branch (20-30+) enterprise, which has deployed private addresses and network-to-network VPN's inside it, wants to start using IPv6. I'm wondering whether there exist any ed

Example for IPv4 compatible IPv6 address?

2003-09-14 Thread Bhaskar S
Hi, Please could someone explain how IPv4 compatible IPv6 address is used? -- Regards, Bhaskar S. IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 ---